Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
In other words, the Natural Right of Rebellion.

It's hypocritical to think otherwise.

Nothing there says that the British don't have the concurrent right to put down the rebellion.

As long as they realize that success means that they've simply taken the rebels as hostages.

374 posted on 04/08/2008 1:18:18 PM PDT by cowboyway ("No damn man kills me and lives." -- Nathan Bedford Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: cowboyway
As long as they realize that success means that they've simply taken the rebels as hostages

If that's the way you really feel, I look forward to seeing on the news that you've launched your rebellion. Until then, I can only conclude that you either:

a) don't think it's actually that bad, or
b) don't have the gumption to do anything about it.

375 posted on 04/08/2008 1:23:53 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

To: cowboyway
As long as they realize that success means that they've simply taken the rebels as hostages.

That's like saying the police should know that the bank robbers they've apprehended are simply hostages.

Rebellion is, by definition, an illegal act. Suppressing rebellion is halting the law breaking. Punishing the rebels is simply doing justice.

380 posted on 04/09/2008 4:51:00 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson