This prosecutor was exposed two years ago on FR for her foolish prosecution of the "snow fort" kids. The case here is being prosecuted by the "child abuse" division of the DA's office. Shades of Mike Nifong? Waste of funds?
1 posted on
03/26/2008 3:16:32 AM PDT by
Nifonged
To: Nifonged; Admin Moderator
So Mr. Frank, two questions:
1.)Should I send my contribution directly to you?
2.)Would our fellow Freepers vote the "victim" guilty or not guilty?
2 posted on
03/26/2008 3:51:18 AM PDT by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: Nifonged
I would rather read a less biased description of the case. In any event, the poster is a newbie, and Mr. Frank is not someone I would want within 10 miles of my daughters. Whether the judge was goofy in a snow fort decision is irrelevant regarding the merits of this case.
3 posted on
03/26/2008 4:53:30 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
To: Nifonged
the guy is a pornographer. difficult to work up any sympathy.
4 posted on
03/26/2008 5:22:06 AM PDT by
Soliton
(McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
To: Nifonged
What are the “bad acts” that the message board postings are being used to demonstrate.
I understand it involves Thailand and sex.
If we are talking going to Thailand to have sex with kids then I favor the death penalty.
If we are talking about evidence of consensual sex with adults being used to “prove” child porn then that is very troubling.
That question makes all the difference.
5 posted on
03/26/2008 5:49:07 AM PDT by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson