North American Union becomes litmus test for political hypocrisy among Presidential candidates

Many Americans who seek to consider which candidate to vote for in upcoming Democratic Party Primaries may wonder which front runner candidate can they trust to best represent the expressed political party values: Hillary Clinton, John Edward or Barack Obama? These values and related policy agenda supposedly include defending America's "middle class'; affirming labour and equality rights; increasing accessibility to healthcare insurance with other social issues; protecting America's natural environmental heritage; redressing Global Warming; and getting America out of the costly Iraq War, which would free up needed public resources for domestic economic recovery. All the Democratic frontrunners have been very eloquent about their professed commitments. However, there is one critical issue, which exposes all of them to be apparent lying hypocrites.

That critical issue is that of the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership North American Union (SPP-NAU). The U.S. President George W. Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda, would literally undermine and subvert the kind of values and related policy areas that Democratic Presidential candidates have professed to support. The silence of the Democratic Presidential candidates on the SPP-NAU, demonstrates a complete lack of integrity and disingenuousness. The failure of Democratic Presidential candidates to confront the Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda demonstrates that these candidates opposition to the Bush Administration, is merely political theatre, directed at a "gullible" American public.

The apparent truth of the matter is that Democratic Party Presidential candidates, who are all engaged in a conspiracy of silence over the SPP-NAU, along with Mr. Bush, and most of the Republican Party Presidential candidates are little more than different faces of the same malevolent consciousness whose members are working in concert with one another behind the scenes.

The apparent political conflict with one another, is no more real than the conflict that one can find in the typical American production of a Hollywood film.

Americans who seek a better quality-of-life, need to be guided by action, and not simply political rhetoric. Silence, as the action of U.S. Democratic Presidential candidates on a Bush administration effort, conveys a Democratic Presidential strategy of co-operating in a political charade against the American people.

The conspiracy of silence among Democratic Presidential candidates is far more hypocritical than the Republic Presidential candidates, because the "credibility gap" among supposedly more progressive Democrats is far worse. Silence by a Republican candidates like John McCain and his other political party Republican Primary candidates, with their biases toward Big Business interests makes them less hypocritical. This is because these candidates are members of a political party, that unapologetically represents the kind of Big Business biases that SPP-NAU agenda is designed to advance.

Respective political party elites, in collusion with the U.S. political-military-industrial complex in both the Democratic and Republican Parties, through a greed-driven political process that relies on "big bucks", have ensured that any successful candidate running for President of the United States, will represent the core values of a neo-fascist agenda. U.S. President George W. Bush and his current White House colleagues, are just a relative handful of representatives of a well organized "bureaucracy" of related political interests.

Republican Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate to publicly take on the issue of the SPP-NAU agenda, in association with Congressman Virgil Goode.

Mr. Goode (R-VA), had introduced H.C.R. 40 in January 2007, which presented the acknowledged the real threat which the NAU agenda presents:

"Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada."

H.C.R. 40 has over forty co-sponsors who include: Rep. John J. Duncan (TN-2), Rep. Virginia Foxx (NC-5), Rep. Walter B. Jones (NC-3), Rep. Charles W. Norwood (GA-10), Rep. Ron Paul (TX-14), Rep Ralph Regula (OH-16), Rep. Jim Saxton (NJ-3), Rep. Cliff Stearns (FL-6), Rep. Patrick J. Tiberi (OH-12), Rep Zach Wamp (TN-3). LINK

Mr. Goode's efforts have acknowledged that, behind closed doors, a new scheme is being drawn up to eliminate the borders with Mexico and Canada, replace the Dollar with the "Amero" -- thus destroying American's savings and economic stability; and create a "North American Union" (NAU) like the anti-democratic European Union.

This scheme has been identified as replacing decision making through democratic institutions instead with government under the direction of "directorship" of large corporations and non-elected "advisors" in Mexico, Canada, and the United States. The U.S. political-industrial-military complex, and its Canadian and Mexican allies seek to replace the democracies of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico with a "North American Union" entity that operates as a "national security state".

The SPP-NAU agenda, had also been acknowledged in Canada by the CanWest Global owned Ottawa Citizen, in the article entitled North American Union' plan under fire, that had been published in February 17, 2007. LINK. CanWest Global is a multi-billion dollar media enterprise in Canada, which includes newspapers across Canada and a network of cable television stations.

That article by a well established media organization further emphasises that Americans need to wake up to the fact that Democratic Party Presidential candidates professings of seeking to present Americans with a "new course" away from the self-serving agendas of the U.S. Bush Administration, are statements that are being presented with hypocrisy of the worst kind. Americans as a whole, need to wake up also to the apparent fact that the clandestine elite neo-fascist inspired agenda of SPP-NAU demonstrates that its society's leaders professings about championing democracy in the execution of the "War on Terror" is total mass-deception.

The SPP-NAU, is an effort by the U.S. Bush administration to ensure that whatever is the outcome of the U.S. Presidential election, their clique will rule "North America", toward aspirations of neo-fascist authoritarian Global dominance. SPP-NAU represents the creation of a North American "national security state" under One Party Rule, that will make the Office of the President, along with Congressional representatives, ceremonial positions, like Queen and the Royal Palace in the United Kingdom.

The SPP-NAU agenda is an apparent effort to concentrate global power, in an alliance with the Big Business elites of the neo-fascistic European Union, in a march toward the consolidation of an Orwellian-like "New World Order", where the kind of values fought by great former champions of the Democratic Party like Robert Sargent Shriver, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Robert F. Kennedy, will be totally disregarded, in favour of an agenda of exploitation and oppression under an unaccountable neo-fascist clique.

Perhaps people don't like using the word "fascist." Then substitute it with something that makes them feel better. How about no representation and a shredded Constitution?

Excerpts posted below from my home page. For the doubting Thomas' please feel free to obtain more information on my home page and/or at any of the links contained therein or below:

The Council on Foreign Relations is pushing for a North American Union.

Building a North American Community [pdf file]
May 2005 | Robert Pastor
Member of the Council on Foreign Relations
Excerpts:

• Our economic focus should be on the creation of a common economic space that expands economic opportunities for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely.
• The strategy needs to be integrated in its approach, recognizing the extent to which progress on each individual component enhances achievement of the others. Progress on security, for example, will allow a more open border for the movement of goods and people; progress on regulatory matters will reduce the need for active customs administration and release resources to boost security. North American solutions could ultimately serve as the basis for initiatives involving other like-minded countries, either in our hemisphere or more broadly. [p. 7]
WHAT WE SHOULD DO NOW
• Establish a common security perimeter by 2010. The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should articulate as their long-term goal a common security perimeter for North America. In particular, the three governments should strive toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so, no matter which country he elects to enter first. We believe that these measures should be extended to include a commitment to common approaches toward international negotiations on the global movement of people, cargo, and vessels. Like free trade a decade ago, a common security perimeter for North America is an ambitious but achievable goal that will require specific policy, statutory, and procedural changes in all three nations.
• Develop a North American Border Pass. The three countries should develop a secure North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers. This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout the region. The program would be modeled on the U.S.-Canadian "NEXUS" and the U.S.-Mexican "SENTRI" programs, which provide "smart cards" to allow swifter passage to those who pose no risk. Only those who voluntarily seek, receive, and pay the costs for a security clearance would obtain a Border Pass. The pass would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to, but not a replacement for, national identity documents or passports.
• Develop a unified North American border action plan. The closing of the borders following the 9/11 attacks awakened all three governments to the need for rethinking management of the borders. Intense negotiations produced the bilateral ‘‘Smart Borders’’ agreements. Although the two borders are different and may in certain instances require policies that need to be implemented at two speeds, cooperation by the three governments in the following areas would lead to a better result than a "dual-bilateral" approach: [pp. 30-31]

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

--David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

David Rockefeller - Memoirs, Random House, 2002, page 405.

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"

David Rockefeller in an address to a
Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991.
Cheney Laughs At Lying about CFR Directorship,
after taking a question from David Rockefeller [youtube]
(at ~ 1:38 into 1:54 min. video).

"Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish with the United States, but also with Canada, our other regional partner, an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union, with the goal of attending to future themes as important as the future prosperity of North America, and the freedom of movement of capital, goods, services and persons."

-- Vincente Fox, then President of Mexico
May 16, 2002 | Before the members of the "Club Century XXI" in the Hall Conferences of the Eurobuilding Hotel, Madrid, Spain
[full text: Spanish | English]

VIDEO (3:12 min.): Lou Dobbs | North American Union by 2010

SPP Summit Scheduled in Canada, Summer 2007
U.S. Taxpayers May End up Footing the Bill

Through the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch recently obtained a 10-page document, "a financial work plan that describes how U.S. taxpayers would fund grants to Mexico. The work plan states:

'...the establishment of a grant fund for development with U.S. and Canadian resources to finance the development of physical infrastructure in Mexico.'
Canadian funds would also be committed to the project. Judicial Watch is calling for complete disclosure...."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.