Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

Thanks George great link on coyote attacking people.

The issue here is why should people move. The wolves were shove down their throats by city people who watch too much TV. You don’t just move a ranch the wolves were move in on the ranchers. So if the wolves are so important to you people why don’t you pay the ranchers for their loses? Put your money where your mouth is.
A peer review study in Idaho found ranchers were only being paid for 1 out 7 loses from wolves. Who paid for the other 6 the rancher did. These kind of loses never happen until the wolves were brought into the eco-system. So if you think wolves are great then pay for them instead of forcing the ranchers to pay for your wishes.


149 posted on 02/02/2008 11:58:28 AM PST by Bruce 22-250 (Vote stop the WITCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce 22-250; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; marsh2; calcowgirl; Troublemaker; jazusamo; Cold Heart; ...

The eco-nuts say that they pay ranchers for their losses. The eco’s know that this is a big lie as they say this garbage as “ pr “ coverage for their liberal media friends to repeat.

One big scam : the media loves to quote these prepared lies.

Their second goal is to bankrupt working ranchers so that the homesteads can be taken over for wilderness. Wolves, ESA... help in this agenda.


Federal authorities were forced to cut off water to 1,500 farms in Oregon’s and California’s Klamath Basin in April because of the “endangered” sucker fish.

The environmental groups behind the cutoff continue to declare that they are simply concerned for the welfare of a bottom-feeder.

But last month, those environmentalists revealed another motive when they submitted a polished proposal for the government to buy out the farmers and move them off their land.

This is what’s really happening in Klamath—call it rural cleansing...

The strategy of these environmental groups is nearly always the same: to sue or lobby the government into declaring rural areas off-limits to people who live and work there. The tools for doing this include the Endangered Species Act and local preservation laws, most of which are so loosely crafted as to allow a wide leeway in their implementation.

In some cases owners lose their property outright. More often, the environmentalists’ goal is to have restrictions placed on the land that either render it unusable or persuade owners to leave of their own accord.

http://www.keepourrights.org/wallstjour.htm


151 posted on 02/02/2008 12:44:43 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson