Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: I Drive Too Fast

I think Natalie’s gone unless she wins immunity. I have a feeling the power threesome of the favorites is going to stick together. Even though I don’t like her, I kind of want Natalie to win immunity just to shake things up. Part of the fun of watching Survivor is seeing a gloating majority alliance triumph, then realize that its members now have to turn on each other. It’d be boring not to be able to see Amanda, Cirie, and Parvati finally turn on each other in the end.

Also, an Amanda-Cirie-Parv Final 3 would probably result in a dull & predictable win for Amanda, since most of the jury is so bitter towards Cirie and Parv (who, like them or not, were playing the game from the beginning. Amanda only really started playing after Ozzy got voted out).

Can Amanda pull off the jury vote part of the game? I think she’s learned from her experience in Survivor: China, where her poor performance in front of the jury handed the win to Todd. She’s now much better at public speaking and manipulating minds.


604 posted on 05/08/2008 9:26:24 PM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies ]


To: JillValentine
I think they are going back to the Final 2, instead of Final 3.

In the previews for Sundays Finale, they said there were going to be three more tribal counsels. That means Final 4. Final 3. and then Final 2 with the Jury questions. I think Cerie is out, and the Final 2 will be Amanda, and Parv, unless Cerie wins immunity.

611 posted on 05/09/2008 3:00:30 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson