To: sofaman
It would be great if the Pats thought that those guys WOULDN’T be playing, and then they did at the last minute —or however long you HAVE to let another team know that your guys are on the roster. They, they will have to come up with two game plans to try and beat you. Sofaman, I truly think that we wone BECAUSE there was no LT. Back to game plans again. We had to play different than expected because we weren’t building the world around LT. They didn’t know WHAT to expect for the same reasons. I think that helped.
81 posted on
01/13/2008 3:57:07 PM PST by
NordP
(Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
To: NordP
They, they = Then, they sorry
82 posted on
01/13/2008 3:57:42 PM PST by
NordP
(Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
To: NordP
They will probably be listed as "questionable" which makes it awfully hard to game plan. However, Volek is useless so all they would have to do is key on the running game because that's all that we'd have.
In fact, "useless" is being charitable. His passer ratio going into this game was zero.
I would far rather the Chargers brought in Charlie Whitehurst ... drafted in 2006 out of Clemson.
84 posted on
01/13/2008 4:04:00 PM PST by
sofaman
(To be or not to be is not a question of compromise. Either you be or you don't be. - Golda Meir)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson