1 posted on
01/11/2008 8:39:50 PM PST by
rudy45
To: rudy45
To get true HD quality, I believe you need HDMI-compilant equipment and cabling from start to finish. Sending it via S-Video won’t give you HD but should give you a top-quality normal image.
To: rudy45
Most s-video inputs on LCD televisions are poorly shielded and cross signal loss is common. You likely would get much better video quality using component video. HDMI should just take using a HDMI cable so long as your receiver has HDMI output.
3 posted on
01/11/2008 8:46:31 PM PST by
kingu
(Fred08 - The Constitution is the value I'm voting for. What value are you voting for?)
To: rudy45
I threw all of my VCR’s away 7 years ago...
6 posted on
01/11/2008 9:13:18 PM PST by
BreezyDog
To: rudy45
It's possible that the problem is in the Sony TV instead of in the satellite converter (but that's just speculation on my part). I have a Sony XBR 36-inch CRT HD TV receiver, and it's clear to me that the engineers put most of their effort into getting a great picture in the HD mode or in SD, using component or DVI inputs, whereas the composite and S-video and rf inputs were added as an afterthought (and the picture quality is atrocious).
Nevertheless I'm surprised about the reports that the VCR output is better than the satellite. It may have something to do with quirks in the TV's built-in picture scaling circuitry.
10 posted on
01/11/2008 10:23:13 PM PST by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: rudy45
I will continue to swear by my 1080P DLP set. Plus it’s user-serviceable. What a picture !!!!
11 posted on
01/11/2008 10:32:46 PM PST by
AbeKrieger
(There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson