[Constitution Day]

Heh. Mighty testy, aren't we?

You are bring up RINOs and obfuscation...which may be a valid point.

Then you copy-and-paste Jim's definition of a "conservative" (which looks pretty solid to me personally).

Finally, you remind me "we have no affiliation with any party" (a fact of which I'm well aware).

My point is:

Why bandy the term RINO about when this forum doesn't claim to be a Republican one? Wouldn't "CINO" be more appropriate?

And if FR has no affiliation with any party, why presume to claim what a Republican is and is not (RINO)?

All valid questions, I think...don't you?

[Kevmo]

Wouldn’t “CINO” be more appropriate?
***Yes.

And if FR has no affiliation with any party, why presume to claim what a Republican is and is not (RINO)?
***True, it is presumptuous. Is it equally presumptuous for republicans to come onto this website when they don’t agree with JimRob’s definition and try to change it?

All valid questions, I think...don’t you?
***Yes, thanks for at least thinking through this rather than generating kneejerk reactions.