To: Girlene
I know....they need to fix the headline. But it does look like the baby was a girl. Notice that the article says baby and not fetus. *shock*
1,247 posted on
01/18/2008 12:24:03 PM PST by
IamHD
To: IamHD; Sue Perkick
Yes, the baby was a girl. The initial autopsy that they refer to also says she was 8 months pregnant. If that's the case, then she would have become pregnant in mid April, right at the time she indicated there was a second assault. Reports say the first encounter was March 26, with the second encounter two to several weeks later.
If the autopsy of the baby says 8 months, it backs up her claims. How could the first pregnancy test on May 11th miss that she was pregnant?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson