Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

I know....they need to fix the headline. But it does look like the baby was a girl. Notice that the article says baby and not fetus. *shock*


1,247 posted on 01/18/2008 12:24:03 PM PST by IamHD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1246 | View Replies ]


To: IamHD; Sue Perkick
Yes, the baby was a girl. The initial autopsy that they refer to also says she was 8 months pregnant. If that's the case, then she would have become pregnant in mid April, right at the time she indicated there was a second assault. Reports say the first encounter was March 26, with the second encounter two to several weeks later.

If the autopsy of the baby says 8 months, it backs up her claims. How could the first pregnancy test on May 11th miss that she was pregnant?
1,249 posted on 01/18/2008 12:36:35 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson