[edcoil]

USC would have beaten both teams.

Fight On.

[misterrob]

If USC had not lost their QB for a few games they would have run the table. Their D was great and their running backs are friggen scary.

[Montana4Jesus]

You’re on crack.

[Ingtar]

I beg to differ. I believe USC would not even have done as well as OSU last night. LSU is not Stanford or Illinois.

[Moby Grape]

USC would not have beaten LSU, but would have beaten OSU.

Keep in mind that USC lost to Standford (the biggest lost against the point spread in NCAA history). USC beat Ill in the bowl BUT Ill was not ranked in the top twenty until they beat OSU, and had three loses prior to that.

USC beat Arizona State, but TEXAS beat Arizona State worse that USC did...Ball State had more total offensive yards against Nebraska than USC (as did six other teams agaisnt Nebraska).

In the end, we need a playoff system.

[engrpat]

I agree there!

[KC_Conspirator]

My Jayhawks would have put up a better fight, or at least scored more points.

[SeeRushToldU_So]

I so wanted UGA to play the Calif USC. It would have done my heart good to see GA smoke USC’s butts.

Then the SEC would have blistered all corners of the rest of the NCAA.

[gunnedah]

Yeah,unhuh! My high school team would beat them all. Nothing wrong with having a fantasy. USC would have lost at least three games if they played in the SEC.

[meandog]

USC would have beaten both teams...

Yeah, how 'bout that whoopin' the Trojans put on Stanford? Wish the Trojans would have played my Dawgs 'cause I love to see them get "lubricated"!

[subterfuge]

USC would have beaten both teams.

Well yeah, if they had a decent coach they would have.

[petitfour]

ROFLOL

Who lost to Stanford?????????????????????

[Non-Sequitur]

USC would have beaten both teams.

But still lost to Stanford. Deal with it.