[bubbacluck]

The outfit that inspects zoo’s certified the SF Zoo recently. There have been no escapes since opening in the 40’s that I recall. The SF Zoo management would have no reason to believe the tiger cage was unsafe. I just don’t understand how you can say it’s a fact that there was negligence. I’m not denying the tiger escaped, but why now, after all these years?

[Kid Shelleen]

There have been no escapes since opening in the 40’s

But that was before global warming. All the animals today are more hot and agitated.

[Sawdring]

Either someone let the tiger out or it escaped the cage. In the first scenario that would be cause for murder in the second scenario it would be negligence.