This is the first publication I have seen that puts the blame squarely where it should be- on the zoo’s shoulders.
Unless the boys aided the tiger’s escape, the zoo is fully responsible.
“unless the ‘boys’ aided the tiger’s escape, the zoo is fully responsible.”
How the hell do you know? Were you there? Do you know even 10% of what really happened there?
Yep. The boys deserved is good butt-whipping for taunting the tiger, but not a mauling.
“Unless the boys aided the tigers escape, the zoo is fully responsible.”
“The boys”? I don’t think these punks are “boys” any more than I think our troops are “kids”. Thats liberalspeak.
Wonder why they figured they needed the services of one of the slimiest criminal defense lawyers known to man?
Wouldn’t a personal injury lawyer be the more appropriate choice to recoup damages for these innocent lil’ chillrun?