Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SpringheelJack

Re: It’s only within guidelines if it prevents the tiger from getting out

Huh?

If the height was within the guidelines, the guideline may have been wrong, but said height was still within the prescribed height so it would be in fact “within the guidelines”

Get it?


62 posted on 01/03/2008 6:45:33 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA
If the height was within the guidelines, the guideline may have been wrong, but said height was still within the prescribed height so it would be in fact “within the guidelines”

You're missing the point of why these guidelines exist: to prevent the tiger from escaping and hurting somebody. Recommended height is 16.5 feet, because tigers can potentially clear something lower. You can get away with something lower if you do something else to limit the tiger. In this case, the SF zoo had a moat. Ever tried jumping out of a swimming pool? The water really limits how far you can go.

The SF zoo's moat was unfilled.

If the tiger got out, the enclosure was ipso facto substandard and inadequate.

98 posted on 01/03/2008 7:05:31 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson