To: The_Victor
There are other zoos with 12.5 feet. One bit of advice is you dont use a slingshot to whip stones at a tiger while standing on an enclosure rail while drunk on vodka. For example.
To: Nonstatist
I believe there is also a moat.
30 posted on
01/03/2008 6:30:19 AM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: Nonstatist
There are other zoos with 12.5 feet. It would appear that a tiger can clear 12.5 feet. Maybe the national standard should be adhered to.
41 posted on
01/03/2008 6:34:06 AM PST by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: Nonstatist
There are other zoos with 12.5 feet. One bit of advice is you dont use a slingshot to whip stones at a tiger while standing on an enclosure rail while drunk on vodka. For example.If there are other zoos with 12.5 feet then they're hauling ass to extend the wall or creating 6 foot moats, because their inclosure is ineffective and exposes their patrons to danger. We don't know whether those boys were using slingshots or drunk, though a witness has come forward who says she saw them growling at the tigers in jest. Even if true it hardly excuses the zoo for creating an enclosure that a tiger could get out of. They're very lucky it happened on a day when hardly anybody was there.
To: Nonstatist
There are other zoos with 12.5 feet. One bit of advice is you dont use a slingshot to whip stones at a tiger while standing on an enclosure rail while drunk on vodka. For example.
If a tiger can get out of a 12.5 foot moat, the enclosure is unsafe. What if one day the tiger is watching and decides he wants to have a four-year-old as a snack for no more reason than he can?
No sympathy for the punks in this case.
122 posted on
01/03/2008 7:26:59 AM PST by
Cheburashka
(Liberals never think what they have done is wrong, they think they haven't done it enough yet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson