To: Eepsy
“Is it just me, or is the zoo trying to divert attention from the fact they built a tiger enclosure that a tiger could escape from?”
No the enclosure height is within the guidelines. Some want it HIGHER but the height it is now is okay.
11 posted on
01/03/2008 6:22:13 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: nmh
No the enclosure height is within the guidelines. Some want it HIGHER but the height it is now is okay.Complete nonsense. If the tiger got out, the height is not okay. It's only within guidelines if it prevents the tiger from getting out -- like if that moat had been filled.
To: nmh
No the enclosure height is within the guidelines. Some want it HIGHER but the height it is now is okay. I read that the guidelines were 16'4". The current height is only 12'5".
99 posted on
01/03/2008 7:05:49 AM PST by
knuthom
To: nmh
"No the enclosure height is within the guidelines. Some want it HIGHER but the height it is now is okay. Hmmm I have no idea if these guys taunted the tiger to provoke an attack however, if the tiger got over the enclosure at its present height then I surmise its far from OK.
If I am gonna to build an enclosure to keep something in then it is going to be to do so under any circumstances other than sabatage and/or acts of God.
104 posted on
01/03/2008 7:12:42 AM PST by
Mad Dawgg
("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
To: nmh
The height as it is now happens to be BELOW the guidelines. I'm really surprised that you could say that it was OK given that even the top administrator says it's too low.
Do you perhaps sell large animal cages or something?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson