As for “recommended”r “suggested guidelines” they are just that - NOT REQUIREMENTS. With the CRIMINAL track record and their hostility towards those trying to help them in the ambulance and later not cooperating even after they knew one was dead .... tell me something. They’re no “victims”.
Well those are alleged facts not facts (Unless there is video or audio evidence then its "he said/she said" Not saying it isn't true its just not concrete being that witnesses testimony is flakey even at the best of times)
However, everyone should consider this, say these guys DID taunt the Tiger and it thusly escaped the supposedly adequate enclosure, and further place yourself at the scene with a young child who is under your care, and you happen to walk by not knowing someone has taunted the Tiger and it proceeds to get out and dicides that other humans besides the taunters look tasty also.
Do you think a Higher Fence/Enclosure is in order? Or do you want to continue to roll the dice for innocent bystanders who don't taunt Tigers but can be near some idiiots who do?
My vote is higher/better enclosures because not only are animals unpredictable but so are Humans!