Replies

I like what he says -

I was a good researcher . I wouldn't lose my job. I had no tenure to protect. I'm not interested in public debate. And I'm not afraid of being embarassed , which would likely happen . So , without contacting anyone , I simply dug in. Took 40 years. Heh . So , I know I'm not going to convince anyone overnight , especially folks entrenched with the standard model. Oh , no! I come here knowing I 'll not convince anyone, really . I'm merely planting seeds. All I ask is Please watch the videos first, then , if you can be gentlemen then please do. If you are rude , I simply won't respond. Neal Adams

Your comment - Arguments to the contrary are spoken of as heresy by the "scientific community". Frustrating.

The culprit? Peer Review. I think of it as the science mafia.

You sir, are a cad! I have spent HOURS following some fascinating presentations along with some serious, and not-so-serious discussions/debates. AND followed a few searches of my own. Bottom line: Expanding Earth seems to be a very real possibility, at least to this layman. FWIW, counter-arguments appear fairly weak and tend to collapse under their own weight. For the most part they seem to rely upon the "conventional wisdom", such as it is.

Then again, maybe I'm easy ;^)

Thanks for the interesting links. I've really got to look into this some more.