Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
Well I'm trying not to place much emphasis on where the zoo is located since there are probably still a few kids there that like to go "see the animals", but you will most likely get to see the Zoo punished.

Maybe there is a design flaw. Maybe someone tried to retrieve something dropped or was goofing around. Right or wrong the zoo will still end up paying. I've never seen or heard of OSHA coming out and not fining for something. Then there will be damage claims. Finally, the "for the children" scardy cats will try to ban Tigers probably. 1 dead and 2 injured. The cat put down. It's sad all around.

53 posted on 12/27/2007 3:22:41 PM PST by CindyDawg (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
Maybe there is a design flaw.

The national standards for a tiger enclosure are a 16'4" vertical barrier.

See post #43 as to who was responsible for the standards.

The SF Zoo originally claimed the barrier was 20' tall.

Now, as it turns out, the barrier was only 12'.

"Maybe" is an understatement.

85 posted on 12/27/2007 4:33:35 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson