To: TRY ONE
They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards.
(from the same article)
11 posted on
12/27/2007 2:46:57 PM PST by
alisasny
(RIP Lt. Kevin “Kojak” Davis BLUE ANGELS #6 THANKYOU!!)
To: alisasny
They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards. Another story mentioned that the moat was dry, NOT filled with water.
To: alisasny
Who cares how wide the moat is? It’s dry, for one thing. And for another, there’s a set of stairs leding down into it.
To: alisasny
They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards.It would be, if the animal were not a strong swimmer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvgsrT8Z924
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson