Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TRY ONE

They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards.

(from the same article)


11 posted on 12/27/2007 2:46:57 PM PST by alisasny (RIP Lt. Kevin “Kojak” Davis BLUE ANGELS #6 THANKYOU!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: alisasny
They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards.

Another story mentioned that the moat was dry, NOT filled with water.

34 posted on 12/27/2007 3:10:25 PM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: alisasny

Who cares how wide the moat is? It’s dry, for one thing. And for another, there’s a set of stairs leding down into it.


45 posted on 12/27/2007 3:13:49 PM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: alisasny
They also found that, contrary to numbers they had on file, the moat was 33 feet wide, which is sufficient to meet national standards.

It would be, if the animal were not a strong swimmer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvgsrT8Z924

65 posted on 12/27/2007 4:16:36 PM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson