Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
GtG did by insinuating they tranquilized the cat and executed it unnecessarily in “can’t miss” range

Most cops couldn't hit a bull in the ass with a bass fiddle much less kill a Siberian tiger with their normal duty weapon. I expect that they took a healthy regard for the tiger's ability to render their body armor and "Fritz" helmets into so much tissue paper. Since we don't know if they had long guns available I simply posited a scenario in which it was possible to kill a tiger with a handgun.

As for "heroic" cops, my three nephews (cops one and all) tell me that heroic cops tend to become dead cops at an alarming rate. Smart cops shoot from cover and take no unnecessary chances and thus get to retire and become old cops.

Regards,
GtG

PS One of my nephews has been everything from a town constable to a state trooper, prison guard, and a Marine. I trust his judgment on "Heroics".

253 posted on 12/27/2007 2:38:53 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: Gandalf_The_Gray
Smart cops shoot from cover and take no unnecessary chances and thus get to retire and become old cops.

And shooting a loose big cat with a tranquilizer gun (which takes time to take effect, I will remind you) would be a very big unnecessary risk. Four cops, even with handguns, I'm sure could take down a cat with lethal force.

256 posted on 12/27/2007 2:43:55 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson