Skip to comments.
Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Coupon Program (Get free money to convert...)
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) ^
| U.S. Government
Posted on 12/26/2007 5:31:51 PM PST by rlmorel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
I just heard about this today...apparently anyone will be able to request two certificates totaling $80 US. My first thought was..."What? Is this an appropriate use of tax dollars?"
Any thoughts on this? Is it appropriate since television is a form of communication with the citizenry? Or is this some kind of boondoggle? Should we all treat it as a tax refund and apply for it? It sounds like the money will simply be granted...
1
posted on
12/26/2007 5:31:53 PM PST
by
rlmorel
To: rlmorel
By the way, if I wasn’t clear, my first thought was “NO WAY!”
2
posted on
12/26/2007 5:32:40 PM PST
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: rlmorel
I want my coupon sent attached to a free government 42” LCD.
3
posted on
12/26/2007 5:37:17 PM PST
by
The Iceman Cometh
(Democrats In Control! (Where's my friggin' free stuff?))
To: The Iceman Cometh
4
posted on
12/26/2007 5:37:48 PM PST
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: rlmorel
It sounds like the money will simply be granted... The analog spectrum used by the old TV channels will be auctioned off, and the auction paid by the auction winners to the federal government are expected to greatly exceed the cost of the rebate program.
5
posted on
12/26/2007 5:39:30 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
To: HAL9000
and the auction paid by the auction winners should be -
- and the amounts paid by the auction winners -
6
posted on
12/26/2007 5:40:23 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
To: rlmorel
Yes it is a boondoggle. We are being thrown a sop, because they are greedily destroying a perfectly good analog system and replacing it with an unwanted digital system.
At least that is how I see it.
7
posted on
12/26/2007 5:45:54 PM PST
by
NathanR
( Duncan Hunter for SecDef)
To: rlmorel; ShadowAce; HAL9000
8
posted on
12/26/2007 6:37:33 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: NathanR
On the one hand, they are rendering your old set useless. So they avoid angry consumers saying, “Now I have to buy a brand new TV set?”
OTOH, if you just use Cable, you’re probably OK.
So they will be allowing TV broadcasting on only a narrow band — I want to say the freed up frequencies will be used for cell phones — anyone know?
To: scrabblehack
Don’t use cable. Wife doesn’t want cable. Cable would cost more than all the tuners I will have to buy. (And I think I will need 5 tuners in one room and maybe that many in the rest of the house)
10
posted on
12/26/2007 6:52:46 PM PST
by
NathanR
( Duncan Hunter for SecDef)
To: The Iceman Cometh
11
posted on
12/26/2007 6:58:14 PM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
To: scrabblehack
Some of the UHF frequencies are going to police and fire departments. The police are planning to use them for WIFI reporting of parking meter fines, among other things.
12
posted on
12/26/2007 6:59:47 PM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
To: NathanR
The digital world allows them to block your right to record the signal (as determined by the Supreme Court in the Sony Betamax decision). The DCMA prohibits circumventing codes that prohibit copying digital data.
13
posted on
12/26/2007 7:01:11 PM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
To: weegee
What about all the DVRs that everyone has? Also, the fancy new VCRs, with digital tuners, also have DVD recorders to record over the air. I think you are wrong on that one. (or more probably partly right, just not for over the air stuff.)
14
posted on
12/26/2007 7:10:44 PM PST
by
NathanR
( Duncan Hunter for SecDef)
To: weegee; neverdem; Joe Brower; .30Carbine
Funny how some of the same kinds of bureaucrats want an analog ‘signal’ transmitted by other types of property, onto the bullets they shoot...but never properly punish those who ‘transmit’ in the commission of a crime....
15
posted on
12/26/2007 7:36:33 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: NathanR
My DVR could detect a macrovision signal and would display a warning and shut off the recording functionality so I could not transfer any old tape content to a disc regardless if I owned a factory tape and would not be sharing content. It didn’t even matter if it was a public domain work. “We” now have videotapes that are over 30 years old which is greater than the 28 years of initial copyright.
16
posted on
12/26/2007 10:10:04 PM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
17
posted on
12/27/2007 12:15:01 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: rlmorel
I think the coupons are only good for the purchase of a converter, so they won;t do you much good if you don’t plan on buying the converters. (For example, I use DirecTV, so I don’t care about over-the-air signals anyway.)
Since analog will be useless by government mandate, it could easily be justified that this represents a “taking” in terms of making people’s private property unusable, so I have little problem with the government making compensation for the taking, especially since, as has been pointed out, the auctioning of the old frequencies will more than pay for the coupon program.
18
posted on
12/27/2007 12:18:42 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(All those in favor of Thompson, don't raise your hand.)
To: NathanR
>>Yes it is a boondoggle. We are being thrown a sop, because they are greedily destroying a perfectly good analog system and replacing it with an unwanted digital system.
At least that is how I see it.<<
Usage of the analog system is in sharp decline - I have not been to a house without either cable, satellite or video over IP in years.
19
posted on
12/27/2007 3:12:55 PM PST
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: gondramB
Maybe. But that is what I use.
Where I live there is already too much on TV. Why would I want more?
20
posted on
12/27/2007 4:34:01 PM PST
by
NathanR
( Duncan Hunter for SecDef)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson