Dem environmentalists will tell you that the individual weather situations do not define global warming/cooling (these cold/below normal temps are caused by global warming) and that the average temperatures over the country/world are what counts.
I suggest we take the temperatures of all the major cities as published in the daily papers, average them, and compare to past records. The same could be done with world temps included to get those averages. This would provide a general integration of global temps.
Dem environmentalists are idiots. It's the compilation of all those individual weather stations that give us the average.
Besides, if an individual station gives a warmer reading, they'll use it to support GW anyway, and if it gives cooler, they'll say it's just an aberration. Heads, I win; tails, you lose....
That probably wouldn't be accurate. Temperature readings have been taken at airports a lot of the time over the years and airports have gotten bigger planes and more concrete over time, plus city sprawl has extended past most airports also making the temps a little warmer where the temp readings are taken.