I think the choice of charges is telling. They didn’t charge him with any act against the other guy per se, just flipped through the books till they found suff they thought they could make stick relating to details of the encounter. If the state thinks the guy was wrong, why aren’t they charging him with ADW or something based on the substance of the incident like that?
The RedStar Tribune has now weighed in with this headline..........
“Man indicted in drive-by shooting involving suburban cop”
http://www.startribune.com/local/north/12636046.html
This case will re-ignite the lefties in the legislature to try and repeal our carry law. Bet on it.