I like Romney better than McCain, Giuliani, Huckabee.
I’d vote for him.
Yet I don’t understand how you can remove from the table
1) A presidential candidates ideology
2) The organizations a candidate belongs to.
People can disagree about how important these things are, and how they should be discussed, but to say they shouldn’t be considered or talked about at all is wrong in my opinion.
But not an unconstitutional 'religious test' however masked. But perhaps this happens more in practice than in realized. Republicans have never nominated a Catholic [Rudy don't count, if he happens]. Being a Mason seems to help.