Fortunately, all my ideas come though the broken bottom of a Coke Bottle, my “seer stone”. What my seer stone is telling me is that you have the brain of a pea.
Good start and it gets better as it goes. If anyone is in need of examples of what passes for intelligence, decency, discussion, open, honest, and dignified, it is here for all to see.
[Good start and it gets better as it goes. If anyone is in need of examples of what passes for intelligence, decency, discussion, open, honest, and dignified, it is here for all to see.]
And of course the reason the gracious Moderator will likely not pull my post is because it logically tied jveritas in a circle. But simply claiming to have a religious connotation to telling jveritas he had the brain of a pea, BY HIS OWN VANITY LOGIC, I put his ability to question my insult off limits.
Now, that is certainly a viciously painful post I made distinctly because it points out the embarassing fact that jveritas’s logic is full of holes. ANY candidate in jveritas’ crimped universe can put ALL political debate off limits merely by claiming it is part of his religion.
Now the reason I used the “brain of a pea” insult (I could think of much worse) was really not to insult, but to provide enough of a contrast to force jveritas into the logical bind. For the perceived insult, I apologize, however I do not apologize for the larger point.