To: Terpfen
Really wish I knew why people consider Windows Mobile-equipped phones to represent any sort of quality. For some reason, I doubt you actually do want to know. But giving you the benefit of the doubt, those of us who use and depend on such phones value functionality and interoperability over froofroo graphics. It's more useful to me to be able to run (Windows) business apps on my phone than to be able to flip through my already-sorted MP3's by album cover.
7 posted on
12/12/2007 6:35:40 PM PST by
Turbopilot
(iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
To: Turbopilot
those of us who use and depend on such phones value functionality and interoperability over froofroo graphics.
Yeah, I figured I'd get at least one comment like this. Clearly, Apple interfaces focus solely on shiny graphics and have no root in user interface design concepts. All good UIs must be flat, industrial, and businesslike, just like Windows 95.
Just because you can get something done with Windows Mobile does not mean it represents any sort of quality. One can be functional with a bad product, but it's still a bad product.
9 posted on
12/12/2007 6:56:17 PM PST by
Terpfen
(It's your fault, not Pelosi's.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson