Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: B-Chan; dusttoyou; driftdiver; IDontLikeToPayTaxes; monday; Red Badger; ThisLittleLightofMine; ...

This is rape.

The problem with adult women (even if sexy) going after underage males, since it spoils the young man into being a lush for sex, when they have no means other than masturbation (porn industry wins) and premarital sex WITH OTHER TEENS to acquire it.

If you didn’t know that teen-pregnancy is a sure recipe for poverty, now you know, and that’s what this 14 year old will be looking for, and inflicting on the 12 and 13 year olds around him. Just watch.

In short, by raping this boy, she has either activated him into a victim of the porn industry, or into a “stud” which will render many a young girl pregnant.

I am a Christian, and I haven’t even used, “Thou shalt not commit adultery” yet, along with the fact that God does not let adulterers into heaven, and eternal hellfire is waiting for them.


70 posted on 12/06/2007 2:14:09 PM PST by ROTB (Front Runner=rich guy who doesn't hate evil and strives to offend no one, AND WILL SELL YOU OUT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: ROTB
"along with the fact that God does not let adulterers into heaven,"

Please tell me you are joking??? As far as I know the only person that I can categorically say is in heaven, was a criminal worthy of the death penalty, that was on a cross next to Jesus. Put that in your high & mighty pipe and smoke it.

73 posted on 12/06/2007 2:24:43 PM PST by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: ROTB

There’s no doubt that statutory rape has occurred in this case. I’m not arguing that point. What I am arguing is that the adult in this case likely did not force the teenage boy into anything. Legally, yes, this is rape, but rape of a willing victim.

And as for this teacher having “spoiled” this boy into being “a lush for sex” — do you actually know any teenage boys? I can assure you that when I was a teenage boy neither I nor my pals needed any “spoiling” with regard to sex. It was damned near all we ever talked about or thought about, all the time!

Please re-read my post. I did not claim that adult woman-teen boy sex was right, legally or morally; in fact, I flatly stated that any kind of extra-martital sex is wrong. I also never said that adult woman-teen boy sex wasn’t rape. It is, in a legal sense. I simply said that (rightly or wrongly) most teenage boys would welcome being seduced by a blue-eyed blonde woman of statuesque proportions, and I think most men on this forum would agree with me.

You can bet I will be watching Baby Chan most carefully as he grows up. By simply paying attention to his son’s activities and moods, a conscientious father can prevent small crushes from turning into big problems. Like fire, male hormones are a wonderful servant, but a fearful master.


74 posted on 12/06/2007 2:28:05 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: ROTB

Another angle is that boys like that can lose interest in girls their own age.


100 posted on 12/06/2007 4:55:08 PM PST by ichabod1 ("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson