“Are you saying its ok for adults to raid middle schools for their latest sexual conquest?”
I did not so say, not could that have been assumed from what I posted.
What I did say, was that to assume that a teen aged boy is somehow “damaged” by sex with a teacher who all agree is very sexually desirable (note I said nothing of her other lacks, judgement being the first issue) is a stretch worthy of the comic book character “PlasticMan”.
When the law is used by FemiNazis, lawyers, and the child advocacy community to criminalize human behavior which has been well recorded at least as far back as the time when Moses wrote the basics of what became Mosaic Law, then the law has fallen into the hands of asses.
That, Dear Sir, is how and why the cartoon of nine robed judges behind a court bench came to be the symbol of “assinine”.
When “Da Law” mandates the shenanignas this case has produced, hte resulting affront to common sense degrades the essential respect for the law which must be a part of this Republic if we are to remain free.
Despite “Da Law” and the abovementioned assorted, sordid conspiracy of socialists, there is a difference between male and female.
This case is a perfect case in point of why the socialism driven, social engineering of the Democrapic Party, has made the courts a source of jokes for the late night show hosts.
If a commonly agreed upon young female teacher allows a callow youth to mount her, that may be said to have convicted her of the charge of stupidity, adultry, and baaaad judgement.
It should not be used as an excuse to allow the 900# gorilla of government to create a legal circus which can only cause all who watch to lose respect for their government.
That loss is the goal of the Gramscian impaired, you know.
Read Antonia Gramsci and I am sure you will see his communism stained hands in this circus, busy guiding the hands of the consortium of Nasties I defined earlier in this post.