[Starwolf]

The key issue remains sense and avoid. Any common airspace user has to be able to do that and UAVs currently can not do that. What stops the UAV from taking out a chopper, Police or otherwise? That is the key issue, and the FAA will not back down on things that impact safety.

In terms of border us, UAVs would be deployed nearby. They don't need long runways and there is also control and range issues. Possibly there could be some restricted airspace around border imposed to allow them to work.

There are Helicopter UAVs both in the USN (Firescout) and being used as crop dusters (RMAX).

[stevie_d_64]

Safety above security...I believe we were always on the same page there despite my rants implying the contrary...

;-)

The FAA, if they are smart will not back down on that issue one bit, no matter how hard the pressure is for them to do so...

The whole useage issue at the border to me is actually a more workable deal...As long as the data gained is used right then and there by boots on the ground...

Otherwise the program is a complete waste of time and money...