Posted on 11/15/2007 6:04:09 PM PST by Ouderkirk
Then again, maybe oldchurch does, as I note he did not respond to you.
;)
The spam called Hunter a RINO and a Socialist so I don’t think they were Hunter supporters lol
He is effectively pro-choice. He is unwilling to take a leadership stand on the slaughter of the innocents, saying "To each his own." That's a pro-choice stance.
And he took blood money to champion pro-abortion legislation as a lobbyist and lied about it when confronted.
Pissant was banned for saying the emperor is buck naked.
That’s not what he said at all. He’s never come close to repudiating McCain-Feingold. Lots of his supporters have tried to interpret it that way, but it’s just wishful thinking on their part.
But, if you want to really debate the subject, go find the transcript to back up your claim and I’ll be glad to go through it with you to prove my point.
Looks like a job for Robinson - cue the lost in space picture.
Presidential election politics are high stakes. And programmers/data mining are relatively easy to come by these days.
So, the question would be, Gulliani, Romney, Paul, Huckabee McLaim...?
Exactly. I have pretty much caught pissant’s posts; but I must have missed a few because i don’t see him rubbing anyone anymore than the next.
Yes, he is dedicated for Duncan Hunter; but I am too and so are several others here. Nothing against Fred or anyone else; but election time can create high fevers. I think what pissant is upset about as am I is seeing a bunch of Rinos as top tier without any clue as to why they are there except people are playing games with us, the public.
pissant just wants the best for the country as we all do.
I am sorry he got banned. Maybe it’s temporary and hope he will be back soon.
I got pretty much the same FReepmail, but I don’t recall it having the part about pissant.
DITTO!!
Twice for me.
There is a mention of pissant being banned in the email. I too received the email.
Was the link to the Thompson site legit?
It appears so.
I admit that when I first read the freepmail from Im4Fred that I didn't read it very closely. I was angry because he was implying that the website released our names to someone who was shilling for a candidate. I was angry that he was calling Hunter a socialist and a Rhino and that he implied the website owners were banning support of Hunter and Romney. I did not follow the link to the banning of pissant post. When I read it more closely it brings up a lot of questions. It doesn't seem like a real call for donations to Thompson anymore. I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters. 209 posted on 11/15/2007 5:38:44 PM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
key phrase from Elyse...
I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters.
I agree with Elyse's assessment. Don't know who did this, but the email was sent with an intent to do as this poster said or typed......mho
I am usually wrong....so take my post with a grain of salt.
Just freepmail him back and tell him Fred’s a loser - like I did.
the link to the website is under debate....it may be a sham or scam. I did not go to the website posted in the email, but some were saying it asks for a credit card number.....thus it may be a scam.....but the truth is unknown to me....and this is only what I have read tonight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.