[MNJohnnie]

Curious how all you Paulbots are all saying the same thing. Seems you all got the same talking point from your campaign hun? They told you all to start making these fraudulent accusations against anyone who is asking tough questions your candidate cannot answer in the hopes of diverting attention from Paul's complete unfitness for the job of President.

You Paulbots should give up these phony attacks claiming that anyone who dares critic your god Der Paul is engaging in personal attacks. Try ONE time finally addressing the points being made about your candidates positions and history. Try actually defending your candidates statements and claims instead of mindlessly worshiping him as infallible

What the Paul critics have done is ask legitimate tough questions to which the Paulbots have responded time after time after time with a hysteric rain of invective and personal attacks.

Don’t whine to us because people got tired of you Paulbots habit of responding to anyone who dares point out the real serious flaws in Paul’s history and campaign with a flood of hyper emotive personal abuse.

Cannot real blame Freepers for choosing to respond to the Paulbots in the only language they all seem to understand.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

What the Paul critics have done is ask legitimate tough questions to which the Paulbots have responded time after time after time with a hysteric rain of invective and personal attacks.

Bumped for the TRUTH! ;)

[1rudeboy]

The only Ron Paul thread I remember participating-on to any substantial degree in my memory was the thread making fun of his rambling and nearly incoherent question to Ben Bernanke. I wonder if that “endeared” me to the Paul campaigners here. Their defense of him was equally incoherent.