Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: A. Morgan

Wind will not solve all our problems, but it is a part of the solution. And we need more of them as soon as possible.


4 posted on 11/10/2007 3:11:38 AM PST by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Hydroshock
We have to explore, we have to conserve, and we have to pursue all avenues of alternative energy: nuclear, wind, solar, hydrogen, clean coal, biodiesel, and biomass.

Energy independence will ease the effects of globalization because the future energy demands of countries like India and China, as their middle class grows, are going to be tremendous. Even if Middle East supplies remain stable - a huge if - that increased demand will drive prices up dramatically, which will hurt our economy by making everything more expensive here. But if we are energy independent, we will be able not just to take care of our own needs and protect our economy, we will also create jobs and grow our economy by developing technologies that we can sell to the rest of the world to meet their needs. Mike Huckabee.

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=21 I am not a firm MH supporter but... (read tag line)

6 posted on 11/10/2007 3:33:16 AM PST by madconserv (Help me I'm lost ...leaning Huckabee-Jesus take the wheel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Wind will not solve all our problems, but it is a part of the solution. And we need more of them as soon as possible.

I have nothing against wind power. I oppose subsidizing it with tax dollars, whether they be federal, state or local.

Here in Pennsylvania, some wind farms were opposed because the locals did not like their look on the top of mountains. Unbelievable.

7 posted on 11/10/2007 3:34:22 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Wind will not solve all our problems, but it is a part of the solution. And we need more of them as soon as possible.

Exactly.

11 posted on 11/10/2007 4:58:40 AM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Wind will not solve all our problems, but it is a part of the solution. And we need more of them as soon as possible.

Twice this year I've flown airplanes from Chattanooga to New Mexico and to SW Colorado. Along the way I flew over literally hundreds of wind mills, both operating and under construction, in west Texas and the Oklahoma panhandle. Somebody ought to think about installing a few outside the door of the US Capital building in DC. There's plenty of wind coming out of there......

14 posted on 11/10/2007 5:06:08 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Thinking of voting Democrat? Wake up and smell the Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
To put things into perspective. In 2005, the US generated 978 gigawatts of electricity. The 4,000 MW is nothing more than a pimple on an elephant's butt,
18 posted on 11/10/2007 5:17:19 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
“And we need more of them as soon as possible.”

At what cost?
They’re the biggest money losing investment going. If it wasn’t for subsidies, they’d be a dead issue. It takes 20 to 25 years to pay themselves off. We have close to 150 in our county, on any given day, at least 30% of them are shut down due to mecanical failures.

27 posted on 11/10/2007 7:27:30 AM PST by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson