I’m speechless ...
Peterson was turned over to the FBI early Saturday. The boy was turned over to relatives in Mexicali because he was an illegal immigrant in the United States and was not allowed to return, Arenas said. Fernando's uncle, Pedro Raya, said he spoke to the boy Saturday and they agreed he would go to the family's rural hometown in the southern state of Guanajuato, mainly because of his immigration status.
Just boinking the American teachers that American youth are too lazy to boink . . .
I posted on the thread the other day that I would bet he was an illegal, just stealing an education no one else would steal. Now round up mom and pop, wouldn't’t want to separate the family.
Hmmm....a confluence of conflicting liberal ideals.
I hope this sick bitch ends up in a Mexican prison.
The teacher is a sick-o for her actions and unnatural pedophile desires.
On the other hand - she may have actually helped us out some by voluntarily deporting an illegal...
These female teachers seem to fall into at least 2 categories (maybe more, I’m inviting collaboration here), with different ‘moral’ status in my book:
First, there’s the romantic fantasists (like the here) who are deeply but delusionally in love with the boy-man student. They are in the throes of a form of temporary insanity (not the legal kind, however) where they are locked into a romantic fixation bordering on psychosis.
Then there are those who fall into the “I’m finally living out my fantasy” where they become the “popular with the boys (plural)” they never really were when then were teens. This can also be a form of temporary insanity, but it takes on a more predatory form, involved drinking, hosting parties, taking on multiple boys, etc. Obviously, from a moral perspective this is much more evil than the first category. Another form of this is to engage in the acts with one boy, but in front of other boys.
You can go through the cases (there are hundreds by now) and categorize them in “Group A” and “Group B”. Now maybe sub-groups would emerge, based on, i.e., the age of the target-boys. Certainly there’s a big difference moreally and operationally (i.e., who was the initial aggressor) between 17 y.o.’s versus 11 y.o.’s
ping
WTF?What r these teachers thinking when they bed underage students?Isn’t there any guilt in taking advantage of a minor?Don’t they consider the consequences like jail,public humiliation,kissing their careers goodbye?Confused:(