Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2007 10:24:26 AM PDT by ROTB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NCSteve

ping


2 posted on 11/01/2007 10:27:51 AM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ROTB
Ask them yourself.

I use samba shares on linux, HPUX, AIX and Solaris on a regular basis. Never had problems. I use Fedora 7 as one desktop, no problems.

3 posted on 11/01/2007 10:38:21 AM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ROTB

Samba is developed on a build farm. There are a number of different flavors of *nix that run automatic builds of the Samba tree. The contributing developers use whatever platform they happen to be comfortable with to write code.

To answer the underlying question, Linux is the kernel. Samba is tightly integrated with the kernel, so to seek out the distribution on which Samba “works best” is probably a waste of effort and time. Support, however, is another matter. One of the commercial Linux distributions (Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva, etc.) is probably going to have the best support structure for Samba (i.e. nifty GUI configuration tools, telephone help, and so on).

I have used Samba on every flavor of Unix but AIX and probably a dozen Linux distributions. I have yet to notice any substantial difference in the way it works.


4 posted on 11/01/2007 12:17:33 PM PDT by NCSteve (I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson