Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

If Scott Petersen was the beneficiary, no one should receive the money. I can’t stand insurance companies, but they should not have to pay.


6 posted on 10/31/2007 8:32:48 PM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mefistofelerevised
If Scott Petersen was the beneficiary, no one should receive the money. I can’t stand insurance companies, but they should not have to pay.

Gotta disagree here.In a case like this the proceeds should be paid to her estate so that anyone entitled to inherit a portion of that estate would benefit.

8 posted on 10/31/2007 8:35:58 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mefistofelerevised

It would be my guess that as the beneficiary, Scott is the contract recipient of the funds. The insurance company would have to pay out to him under the contract, but the Court ruled that he cannot profit from his crimes, so the insurance company’s payout was probably deposited with the Court instead of to Scott. The Court is just ordering that Scott cannot get the money that the insurance company paid out. And maybe Laci’s mom was an alternative beneficiary, and the court’s ruling just bumped Scott as a beneficiary as if he had predeceased Laci.


11 posted on 11/01/2007 4:56:56 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Only YOU can prevent the fires of Hillary Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson