[Iron Munro]

If Liz had her wits about her she would give the painting up.
Her ownership is tainted no matter what the court says.
The legal details and findings may be in her favor but no one ever said the law was moral or ethical.
Well - actually they did but we all know better.

But after all - its only the jooze complaining about the Holocaust again - Ho-hum........

[poinq]

Liz has no shame to keep a painting she bought from a Jew who bought it from a Jew who never was in the Holocaust. This painting was not a masterpiece at the time. The painting was not in Germany at the time. This is simply a family looking to win the lottery using the Holocaust. You all are referring to paintings where the ownership is in doubt. This painting’s legal lineage can be traced back to the painter.