Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

California was taken by treaty as I recall. How does that compare to the property of Jews in Europe. I don’t care how many transactions their were, unless you can show the family didn’t care at those times.


10 posted on 10/31/2007 5:39:22 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: purpleraine
Not only was California acquired and treaties signed, but Spanish landgrant holders and the Roman Catholic church were reinstated as owners of their property (which had been, in many cases, seized by Mexico).

More recently (to buy voters so he wouldn't get recalled) Gray Davis supported legislation in the California legislature that would RETURN property (real and otherwise) to Mexican citizens or others of Hispanic origin who'd had it seized by California just before they were returned to Mexico for violating immigration laws.

I think someone reminded Gray that this would most properly include Japanese-Americans who had vast tracts of land and water rights improperly seized by California in the 1940s. That would have created some really nasty title problems for tens of billions of dollars of real estate in Downtown Los Angeles.

Apparantly California's Democratic party decided it was more important for rich landlords to continue to prosper than for Gray Davis to continue in office.

Bye bye Gray (you could hear them say as that particular piece of legislation went back to the committee for pigeonholing).

26 posted on 10/31/2007 6:28:51 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson