Posted on 10/23/2007 5:53:57 AM PDT by js1138
There's been some complaining on the original thread about hijacking, so I'm offering a chance for you guys to continue the debate without all the distracting comments. I'd suggest not pinging anyone until the debate is finished.
Here's a rcap of the debate so far. The first argument is in brown; the reply to part one of the first argument is in green.
Hey AiG, if you ever feel up to the challenge of dividing your time between this thread and the original thread, I would welcome the opportunity to explore your ERV arguments. Let me know when you find some spare time.
If anyone wants to learn more about evolution, here is a list of websites and books that will help:
http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2007/08/top-evolution-defense-sites.html
http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2007/08/top-evolution-defense-sites.html
Don't forget PatrickHenry's Un-Missing Links:
http://wiki.darwincentral.org/tiki-index.php?page=Un-Missing+Links
Historical note: These were originally compiled by the Spokesman for the Grand Master as the legendary List 'o Links, and are now brought to you as a public service by Darwin Central, The Conspiracy that Cares.
That must be a subtle attempt at humor, for if that counts as history to you, you have a very odd sense of history.
And: Spokesman for the Grand Master, and brought to you as a public service by Darwin Central, The Conspiracy that Cares ??
Really, you guys have not done science, here or there. And just how many advanced evo PHD’s did it take to come up with that?
AiG, you there? I have a number of comments and questions re: ERVs and common descent. If you’re interested, I would like to commence this thing on the other debate thread. You game?
AiG, could you please respond to the following post on the other debate thread re: ERVs and Common Descent.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1913314/posts?page=1392#1392
Thank you—GGG
I thought he answered rather well. How about you take your objections to the authors of the journal articles and report back to us.
He’s banned, so how could he possibly answer me?
Tell me you aren’t that dim.
I’m not that dim.
On his blog, he said he posted something about Dawkin’s “God Delusion” and that was got him banned. I’m not sure exactly what he tried to post, or what he tried to do with it. But if possible, I would like to have him back in an expanded debate that would include ERVs.
If you know something about ERVs the has eluded all the PhDs, why not take it directly to them. Let’s face it. You are far above the level of even Nobel prize winners. Why pick on us?
Even if you can’t get the professionals’ attention, you can publish your earth shattering theory privately and get credit for it when the mainstream eventually comes around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.