The moral thing to do would have been to try to feed and hydrate her by spoon. If she had survived like that...a natural survival....then it would have been above reproach.
But the system refused her loved ones the chance to try.
Her dirtbag husband wanted her to die as quickly as possible.
They tried (I think Judge Greer eventually backed down) to deny the Schindler’s family priest the right to give her a crumb of a Communion wafer and a drop of wine when he administered Last Rites. They detained at gunpoint a ten or eleven year old boy who tried to bring her a bottle of water. It was inhumane beyond belief.
“The moral thing to do would have been to try to feed and hydrate her by spoon. If she had survived like that...a natural survival....then it would have been above reproach.
But the system refused her loved ones the chance to try.”
This is the most powerful explanation of why so many believe Teri was unjustly killed. The courts would not allow any opportunity that could result in her living.
I cannot condone the deliberate starvation of any living being.
Even as a child when we would find a baby bird fallen from the nest we would give it sustenance. It is a very HUMAN response.
Those who would refuse a drop of water or a crust of bread to even a severely brain damaged woman should be marked as callous and heartless in the least and murderers at worst.