Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

''This case has money, greed and betrayal,'' said attorney Richard Lara, whose law firm is representing the third party, the barroom bystander with rabbit ears. ``All the elements of a soap opera.''

!

1 posted on 10/16/2007 7:01:35 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DogByte6RER

So the real question is how much is still left.

FL is an equitable distribution state.

The wife concealed marital assets. She can also be found in contempt of court for lying on her affidavits.


2 posted on 10/16/2007 7:05:36 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

There’s a C&W song in here somewhere.


3 posted on 10/16/2007 7:08:21 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

How greedy can a person be?

Better off to do the right thing and just give spouse their half from the get-go and be done with it!


4 posted on 10/16/2007 7:08:22 AM PDT by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
There have been two cases here in Texas of a spouse hiding a lotto winning and then divorcing the other.

There was jail time involved when all said & done.

5 posted on 10/16/2007 7:23:27 AM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slings and Arrows

ping for $$$$


11 posted on 10/16/2007 9:49:29 AM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slings and Arrows

ping for $$$$


12 posted on 10/16/2007 9:49:36 AM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER; longtermmemmory

Yet another example of why government shouldn’t be involved in defining/registering/licensing/regulating marriage. In a free country, people’s financial affairs should be their own business. If two (or more) people regard themselves as “married”, it should be up to them to spell out in writing what that means in terms of financial arrangements, if there’s to be any sharing or rights to the other party’s money or property. Did these two have a choice, or even an awareness, at the time they got government-married, re Florida being an “equitable distribution” state? Did they even get married in Florida? Or did they move there and find out later that the state had, without telling them, changed their financial rights and obligations?


14 posted on 10/16/2007 1:10:46 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
EAsy to judge - but it sounds like the 'husband' was husband in name only - they had been living apart for 5 years...and it sounds like he was not the father of her kids.

So, let's be honest...How many of us would've

1:

Called up the estranged husband (wonder if Toots was living with him then?) or

2:

Thought, "this will take care of me and my children - if, after I pay 50% in taxes, I don't give him 50% of that - leaving 1/4th for me and my kids..."

16 posted on 10/16/2007 9:14:23 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson