Skip to comments.
SEX AND MARRIAGE WITH ROBOTS? IT COULD HAPPEN
LiveScience, MSNBC.com ^
| Oct 12, 2007
| Charles Q. Choi
Posted on 10/14/2007 5:46:58 PM PDT by sinanju
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: taxed2death
Hmmmm??? I guess there’s hope for pimplely NerdLoserGeeks in the near future!
41
posted on
10/14/2007 6:40:11 PM PDT
by
FiddlePig
(truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
To: taxed2death
36-34-38, Is her other leg the same?:)
42
posted on
10/14/2007 6:48:01 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: Perdogg
lol I was close... what movie was it?
43
posted on
10/14/2007 6:50:44 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Vaporize the "Divide and Conquer" taxes - Have everyone pay the same marginal rate!. NRST!)
To: sinanju
To: sinanju
Maybe, they were inspired by this:
Go here
45
posted on
10/14/2007 6:53:22 PM PDT
by
punster
To: sinanju
QUOTE:"In the future, a man travels to the ends of the earth to find that the perfect woman is always under his nose. When successful businessman Sam Treadwell finds that his android wife, Cherry model 2000 has blown a fuse, he hires sexy renegade tracker E. Johnson to find her exact duplicate."
I think some professor has been getting paid to watch old science fiction...
46
posted on
10/14/2007 6:59:31 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Joe 6-pack
47
posted on
10/14/2007 7:15:10 PM PDT
by
billmor
To: sinanju
Advantages of robots in relationships:
1. No unwanted kids, unless it gets a virus to replicate itself
2. No unwanted diseases, except for same exception as above
3. You want more rights, here’s the right to be turned off
4. Upgrades always in the works
48
posted on
10/14/2007 7:16:50 PM PDT
by
tbw2
(Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: Slings and Arrows
49
posted on
10/14/2007 7:18:05 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: sinanju
50
posted on
10/14/2007 7:36:21 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: Redbob
Are you kidding me? With all the porn freaks masturbating to low-res porn on the internet, I’d figure the market for something which does such a much better job at simulating sex would be explosive.
The only question is whether such masturbation will be confused with marriage in law. And given the ridiculous state of affairs over gay “marriage,” I find it difficult to argue with the professor.
51
posted on
10/14/2007 8:02:32 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: taxed2death
Sounds like my late wife except she was 5’7”, blonde and loved horses. Okay so maybe not so similar, but she was 36-24-38 with a biting sarcastic streak.
52
posted on
10/14/2007 8:03:00 PM PDT
by
redangus
To: MIchaelTArchangel
Just how would this be different from sex with my wife? .lol.It would actually happen?
53
posted on
10/14/2007 8:06:47 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
To: Nervous Tick
No, Katie, actually he's a Scieno, not a robot. But, close...I thought he was a Rondroid.
54
posted on
10/14/2007 8:09:02 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
To: redangus
WHAT? Who the *** are you? Have I been cloned? I’m having existential issues right now.
55
posted on
10/14/2007 8:10:25 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: oyez
I was soooo in love with Sean Young. However, like most of my loves in real life she turned out to be crazier than a bat.
To: FastCoyote
57
posted on
10/14/2007 8:22:11 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
To: Bender2
Like, *PING*, dude!
Cheers!
58
posted on
10/14/2007 8:24:59 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: oyez
Ah, but Rachel was not a robot. She was a human being.
Even if her DNA had a serial number in it, she was human.
To: Luke Skyfreeper
Sort of. Non-human responses on the psych test...
60
posted on
10/14/2007 8:43:45 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
