Theoretically, if HKS had been doing his job properly, which we know he wasn’t, or let’s just say if Rale had been doing it, there would have already been a dormant Daniel trust established and in place before Daniel died, waiting to be activated - so that *if* he died at such an early age, his own estate would have language referring to it in either his will or any letters testamentary that would have been prepared had he died intestate, which he must have. (We haven’t heard otherwise.)
And *if* that had been done, there would have been a sister for those 3 days, who would have split his share of his mother’s estate.
If that group *believed* they would prevail in Marshall v Marshall, there would have been hell to pay if it had been revealed that he, too, stood to gain several hundred million from his mother. Point being, they should have been prepared for the possibility that he and Anna might have died together in a car or plane crash or some other such tragedy - or even if all three, he and his mom and his sister, passed away in the same event.
With a live-in lawyer and others on constant retainer, this should have been done virtually automatically.
This is the most elaborate non-fiction *whodunit*.
IMHO the missing component is a lab slide of HK$’ dark mind.
If we are correct -that this was a pre-meditated double murder - when was it conceived and by whom? I believe that is the most important date. Once that is established, every action, prior to and subsequent will make sense.
From a distance, the HK$ & Anna co-op was just a partnership to pursue and prevail in the Marshall suit. Something in the dynamics of that *relationship* changed from a mutual fund to a monopoly. What and when???
Besides HK$’ personal stake, were there any other, more sinister entities working with, influencing, or bankrolling HK$ and his activities? Who and when?
He seems awfully confident to be a lone operator - are/were there others - (besides KE & his parents) covering his arse and funding him since 1994?
Rather than HK$ being the BRAINS - maybe he was just a foot soldier!
Just pondering.
well I have to admit I’m stumped by the circumstances. Some ins policies have a 30day or even 6month ‘predeceased’ clause, (and a lot of wills do also) which may or may not apply in ANS/DS case. Daniel died intestate according to HKS. I’m just not understanding how all of Daniel’s estate could roll to ANS only, and then how ANS’s estate could roll backwards to Daniels, while continuing to exclude Daniel’s natural father as closest surviving relative.
I guess there’s no way to speculate until we see what HKS files as ‘daniel’s trust’, eh? Think I’ll understand it any better? lol ;)