“”They sounded like gossips.JMO””
Well yes - it is gossip, I believe they described actions, behavior and circumstances they witnessed. One thing I noted tonight Anna confiding in the nanny why she felt HK$ was responsible for Daniel’s death - “Anna said Daniel asked to take the ‘black car’ to tour the island. Anna said ‘let Howard take you’. They left and when he came back Daniel said ‘I’m sleepy’.”
One of them did a masterful imitation of Anna in a drugged state.
And on the matter of the forged checks: KHristine Erosevich signed the check *VicHie*. Eerie!!!!
Questions:
Who would have taped the *sex act*?. Howard!
Where would it have been taped? Most likely the CA house!
Why tape sexual acts? To watch later. To prove to Anna that LB was in fact bi-sexual and not likely a husband wannabe! Blackmail in case LB wanted to claim custody &/or more money!
I don’t think there is a tape of LB/HKS. I think there *probably* were gay porn tapes that ANS watched, just because it seems like she would.
I probably wouldn’t have thought that, but I remember on some mainstream TV show, either Friends or Sex and the City, or both, the girls talked several times about liking to watch gay men’s porn, so it wouldn’t be anything at all for ANS.
As far as the nannies, I haven’t gotten to watch the videos, have only read the comments through the months, so I don’t have firsthand judgment about their believability. That makes me a non-expert.
I believe the things that had witnesses, like the suicide attempts by Anna - the 48-hour coma and the swimming pool incident - and the details of the pharmacy of meds. I’m kind of wondering why there was no more talk about Dr KE, tho - as much as she was there. That’s odd.
I do believe HKS lived on cigarettes and Slim-Fast and that Anna’s nutritional life was nil. I can’t imagine either of those couch potatoes actually cooking a meal or even an entree. If they had a cook, fine - but I’ve never heard that they did, other than whatever the nannies might have done or Gerlene Gibson.
I don’t believe they ever said on a Mr Controversy tape that they - or just Nadine - had seen this LB-HKS sex tape. I’m not sure about the truth of the Dannielynn “sexy” underfeeding or the drugging of the baby - but I *could* give them the benefit of the doubt on it, as being a sometimes thing, but not constant.
There are tons more things I’d like for someone to question them about, other than just the things that they came up with. They lost a lot of credibility with me on the “mashed potatoes with peas and bacon” thing with the “death photo” incident.
That made me feel like they would just “say anything” - but that’s now that Bain and LizThompson are their handlers. The original affidavits for the inquest, done last December, probably have the most truth in them.
It doesn’t bother me in the least that Ben or Ford paid them afterwards for their time, or in advance, if it was. Rita relaying to them the InTouch offer for photos to license doesn’t bother me, either. I don’t see that as a bribe for her lawsuit.
They asked for money and she asked for proof in writing that they had told an investigator what they said they had told him. It doesn’t matter for Rita’s book, because she has the report from whoever told her - and that’s what would be presented for vetting or in court.
It’s like the testimony of first responders at a crime scene - not presented for the truth of the facts in the matter but as a firsthand witness testifying of how, when, where, some statement was made by someone.
I was very surprised to hear that Clark said Liz Thompson was in the meeting he had with the nannies back in May. And also surprised when she said she was their first attorney of record. I guess Tracy Ferguson of Callenders and Pro Pinder don’t count, for some reason.
So, I don’t really trust the word of any of them - but I don’t throw ALL of the nannies’ statements out with the bath water.