Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Hannity vs. Dobson
1 posted on 10/09/2007 7:50:56 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pissant
"Hannity begs Dobson not to make Hillary president" Title wrong, should read "Hannity begs Dobson to make Rudy President!"
2 posted on 10/09/2007 7:53:20 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

ping for later viewing


4 posted on 10/09/2007 7:54:30 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
It sounded more like a Rudy Giuliani campaign speech to me.

Sean loves this RINO.

5 posted on 10/09/2007 7:57:23 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Hannity is backing the wrong horse in this race and it is gonna cost him listeners. Rush isn’t that dumb.


7 posted on 10/09/2007 8:06:55 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Juli Annie ain't getting the nomination so hannity is indeed backing the wrong horse.

Not voting in this election because the GOP front runner may not support your every position is a vote for Hitlery and absolutely STUPID if you care anything about the future of this country.

8 posted on 10/09/2007 8:37:36 AM PDT by clamper1797 ("Democrat" 'one who panders to the crude, idiotic, and mindless whims of the masses.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Sean begged Ann Coulter as well, with the same lack of effect.

Both Dobson and Coulter were unable to get Sean to realise that we are still in the Primaries and therefore are choosing between REPUBLICAN candidates, and that later is when we support the Republican nominee against Hillary.

I was hopeful since so many conservatives were being obstinate about my favored candidate that Fred would be good enough to surpass him. But so far Fred has not done so, is not the uber-conservative that so many have made him out to be, and while I’ll be happy to compromise and support Fred more and more of the picky conservatives seem to be rejecting him, which puts us back at square one, trying to figure out which “conservative-enough” candidate we can coalesce behind to ensure that Rudy doesn’t get the nomination.

If Fred had been the guy that every conservative could hold their nose and support, we’d have our man. But he’s not, as seen by Dobson and Coulter’s rejection of him. Somebody’s going to have to give or we are going to lose.

Right now, there’s still a lot of posturing by both camps about how they “refuse” to support the other guy. Hopefully it’s just posturing, and once one or the other has won we can come together. The Dobson/Evangelical 3rd-party bid doesn’t sound like posturing, but maybe it is.

Heck, maybe they are just trying to get Fred to be a little more open about the importance of public faith in a leader, and a little more sympathetic to the obvious importance of protecting unborn human beings from being murdered in ANY state in the Union.

And maybe they just hope Fred will realise that having 50 different definitions for Marriage makes no more sense than it would to have each state decide on it’s own which side of the road we should drive on.


13 posted on 10/09/2007 9:29:03 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Make no mistake about it, these candidates and influential political activist leaders who threaten to not support the Party’s nominee are playing political extortion to gain policy concessions or angle for a key appointment. They know very well that if they succeed in pulling away even a moderate fraction of voters from the Republican presidential candidate (and down-ballot Republican candidates that benefit from straight ticket votes), they likely will had the Democrats the win, since recently the margin of victory in many elections is within a few percent.

A true Republican or conservative would not willingly hand power over to liberal Democrats, who are guaranteed to work against our values. Political suicide is not in our nature, nor condoned in our religious teachings, nor consistent with our Constitution. Leave the futile political statements to those not fortified with a higher purpose.


15 posted on 10/10/2007 1:42:54 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson