I don’t see anything wrong with what he was doing. They began interrupting him very early in what he was saying. I guess because he wanted to preface his question with info he had obtained (as inaccurate as it may be), he was told to stop, which I find ridiculous. Stopping him is so anti-
American, it’s unbelievable. It’s not like he went up there drunk, cussing and calling Kerry names. He had pertinent questions. I don’t think someone should be stopped from talking just because they’re stupid. I’m surprised that so many on here agree with tazering someone for speaking what they think!! Y’all CAN NOT be real Freepers...
Well said.
His purpose, judging solely from his behaviour, was disruption. Yr hmbl srvnt would have given, had he been there, very strong consideration to ''interrupting'' him via a pop in the chops.
Police everywhere have a charge (no pun) for third-class jerks such as this, to wit: BNA...being an asshole.