Actually, anyone who is a scientist knows that you are not able to connect the dots. You really come across as a joke to people who actually do this stuff for a living. There was a time when I felt sorry for you, but now you are just another creationist pretender that deserves derision.
You biggest failure is your lack of ability to recognize the difference between new insights that shed more light on how evolution operates versus something that would disprove evolution. The nature of this article is no different than any other area of science where things change. A new chemical reaction may be discovered or the synthesis of new compound, either entirely new or a biological compound never before prepared in the lab. Or a material with radically new peoperties may be prepared. None of this invalidates chemistry. Does the discovery of a new element invalidate the theory behind the Periodic Table? Did Einstein invalidate Newton? No. But some psychological misfiring makes you, and other creationists, think that research that advances biology somehow invalidates evolution and supports the silly notion of a 6K year old Earth and custom made life. Thank God real scientists aren't as mind numbingly incompetent as creationists.