Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger
“My point about how evolution would have written off this important field still stands.”

No it doesn’t. At no point ever has any evolutionary scientist said anything along the lines of “Well, that’s it, we know everything. We can quit now.” To claim that evolution would somehow have ‘written off’ a field of research is absurd in the extreme.

“Based on their beliefs and assumptions, evolutionists were ready to slam the door on exploring the “non-coding” sections anymore.”

Of course this also is not true. Considering that the people who did this research and made these discoveries, not to mention those who peer-reviewed the work for the journal it was published in are certainly all supporters of Evolutionary theory.

“Of course not, the grand theory (in your minds) can sustain numerous flesh wounds as it navigates the fields of flack. “

At no point in this article is the word ‘evolution’ mentioned. Nothing in this article has anything at all to do with evolutionary theory other than that the prediction made by Darwin (That a method for information transfer between one generation and the next would be discovered) is clearly true and is being given more support.

This is a fascinating article about the method by which our bodies construct themselves. It is interesting that our understanding of DNA and how it works is expanding. It has nothing to do with the theory of evolution, and it absolutely certainly in no way lends any support to the notion that the earth is only 6000 years old and all creatures were created as they currently exist.

You still have no evidence to support your claim.

113 posted on 09/17/2007 10:01:17 PM PDT by 49th (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson