Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pit bull attack claims life of family's beloved dog
KOMOTV.COM ^ | 9/13/07 | Eric Schudiske

Posted on 09/14/2007 12:47:14 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: SIDENET

Looks like you’ve got your work cut out for you. If people think that pit bulls are about as dangerous as falling coconuts, there’s still plenty of ignorance out there.

Pit bulls are to dogs what islam is to the world; unpredictable and prone to kill.


41 posted on 09/15/2007 6:49:32 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
My Jack Russell terriers will never give up chasing sqirrels and rabbits, it is what ‘they’ were bred to do. It has nothing to do with whether ‘I’ am a responsible JRT owner or not. They will chase cats, possums, rats and raccoons and dig holes while they are at it and kill them if they can. Not much I can do as a responsible JRT owner to stop it. Stupid rabbits keep coming into the yard JRT keep killing them.

Remember the old saying “breeding will tell” ? I think my grandmother was talking about some trashy people when she said it but it goes for dogs as well.

Why do we read in the news that pit bulls have killed and maimed humans? Because it HAPPENS! Cocker Spaniels bite but they don’t kill, neither do Poodles!

42 posted on 09/15/2007 6:52:39 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Pit bulls were bred to kill!

That is untrue. Pit bulls were bred to fight, and even then, owners found it necessary to "toughen" them and make them mean to ensure that they would fight. Back when dogfighting was legal, dogs that showed aggression towards humans were culled. This is because three people were in the fighting ring with the dogs at all times. These people were the owners or handlers of the opposing dogs and a judge. Pit bulls were actually bred to not show aggression towards humans.

Please read the history of the dog type. Facts are readily available.

43 posted on 09/15/2007 3:13:42 PM PDT by SIDENET (I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
I have read the AKC Dog Book about the history of the breed, white washed. Killing the other dog wasn’t mandatory but it certainly does happen. The killer instinct was what they were after, and they sure got it, in spades. Aggression against humans may not have been desired but is a by product in the dog that dog fighters bred for. Don’t try to tell me any differently, you just make yourself look foolish.

You will never find that I said the breed should be banned because I haven’t said that. I do think the tolerance of aggressive dogs should be zero.

44 posted on 09/15/2007 3:52:17 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET; Ditter

>Please enlighten us on the “usual spin”.<

Ditter has no room to talk, because of her breed of choice. Three of those nasty curs (Jacks) disemboweled a Papillon belonging to a friend of mine. The filthy things got into his fenced yard, and attacked. When the little Papillon flipped onto his back in the classic canine signal for “I give up”, the filthy curs ripped his guts out.

I hate Jacks. I won’t work to have them banned, but I can’t tell you how much I despise them.


45 posted on 09/15/2007 4:29:17 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
Mine have done that to rabbits, it’s breeding you know. Dogs are bred to do a certain thing, it just comes out. My Jacks like other dogs and love it when new friends come to play. They have a blast at the dog park. Do you take your pits there?

I have said on this thread I won’t work to have pit bulls banned either.

I wouldn’t call Jack Russell Terriers my only choice, I have a Black Mouth Cur too. I have had many different breeds over the years but no pits.

46 posted on 09/15/2007 4:50:16 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

I forgot to say if my Jacks had killed another dog I would have them put down because I would never trust them again.


47 posted on 09/15/2007 4:51:40 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Don’t try to tell me any differently, you just make yourself look foolish.

LOL. Nice try to head off any rebuttal. I'll have to remember that approach when I don't have a good argument.

48 posted on 09/15/2007 4:51:40 PM PDT by SIDENET (I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

>Do you take your pits there?<

Cute. I don’t have any terriers, thank you.


49 posted on 09/15/2007 4:53:48 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

What is your dog of choice?


50 posted on 09/15/2007 4:55:29 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

>What is your dog of choice?<

Papillons, hence my distaste for your delightful, “oh, they kill because they’re bred to” Jacks.


51 posted on 09/15/2007 4:57:54 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
Cute dogs. What are Papillions bred to do? Sit on your lap?
52 posted on 09/15/2007 5:32:26 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
there was no owner in sight.

An all-too-common theme in these stories, and the reason is clear -- pit bull owners, by and large, are far more irresponsible than owners of other breeds. Certainly not all, but many.

53 posted on 09/15/2007 5:41:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo ("Hidin' in a corner ...of New York City, lookin' down a .44 in West Virginy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

>What are Papillions bred to do? Sit on your lap?<

They’re descended from spaniels that were too small for the hunt. They’re very adept at obedience, agility and tracking.

Sad to say, they’ve recently been discovered by puppy millers and those wishing to make a fast buck. Whether they will maintain their friendly nature and trainability or be ruined by sloppy breeding remains to be seen.


54 posted on 09/15/2007 6:31:12 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
If things go like they usually do, the more popular they become the worse they will be. Take heart, they aren’t terribly popular ..... yet.
55 posted on 09/15/2007 6:36:47 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

They’ve gone from 1250 registered a year in the early eighties to over 5,000 a year in 2006. It doesn’t sound like much, but the gene pool is being stretched pretty thin.


56 posted on 09/15/2007 7:21:00 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson