Skip to comments.
Pit bull attack claims life of family's beloved dog
KOMOTV.COM ^
| 9/13/07
| Eric Schudiske
Posted on 09/14/2007 12:47:14 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: Ditter
Please enlighten us on the “usual spin”.
21
posted on
09/14/2007 1:24:44 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
To: lula
I dont like it but, what if it had been a child? Yes, yes, what about the children?
People need to be responsible, for both their dogs in their kids. If you own a large breed dog and it escapes and kills someone, it's your fault. And if your kid goes wondering onto someone else's private property unknown to them and gets killed by the family dog, it's the parents' fault, not the dog owner.
Banning is hardly ever the solution.
22
posted on
09/14/2007 1:26:55 PM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: NapkinUser
Pit bull deterrent, actually it would probably work on pretty much anything.

Too bad it's illegal to have one as a pet.
23
posted on
09/14/2007 1:31:43 PM PDT
by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: NapkinUser
“If on the same day in a small town a pit bull kills someone and a bullmastiff kills someone, the media is going to talk about the pit bull-related death. That’s the way it is. Kind of like when the media drummed up “shark attack” fear a few years ago in a year that shark attacks were way down but the media had nothing better to talk about.”
_________________________________________
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1896379/posts
25
posted on
09/14/2007 1:37:14 PM PDT
by
Inyo-Mono
(If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
To: Inyo-Mono
Thanks for further proving my point about media-made fear.
26
posted on
09/14/2007 1:41:27 PM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
>The owners of the quarantined dogs face fines of up to $1,000 for letting his pit bulls run loose.Should be about five years in jail and a $100,000.00 fine.
27
posted on
09/14/2007 1:54:07 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: NapkinUser
And if your kid goes wondering onto someone else's private property unknown to them and gets killed by the family dog, it's the parents' fault, not the dog owner. Wrong, having an unfenced dangerous animal is the same under tort law as having an unfenced pool. You cannot expect kids to make adult decisions.
28
posted on
09/14/2007 1:59:24 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
Wrong, having an unfenced dangerous animal is the same under tort law as having an unfenced pool. You cannot expect kids to make adult decisions. And this is why the law is an ass. If a kid goes onto someone else's property unknown to the owner, and the dog kills that kid, or the kid falls and drowns in a pool, or jumps on a trampoline and falls off and hurts himself, it's the kid's and the parents of that kid's fault.
29
posted on
09/14/2007 2:02:30 PM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: NapkinUser
it's the kid's and the parents of that kid's fault.Have always believed in the old saying that good fences make good neighbors.
30
posted on
09/14/2007 2:27:01 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: SIDENET
I guess what I am referring to is when a bird dog fetches birds and a blue heeler herds cows he is doing what he was bred to do and when a pit bull rips another animal or human to shreds it’s because he has a bad owner. That kind of spin.
31
posted on
09/14/2007 3:09:56 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Ditter
One was a woman sleeping when the pitbulls came into her house and attcked and killed a dog and injured her and her dog in Tacoma, WA area. Then two pitbulls are still on the loose near Seattle in a rural area that killed about 6 of a farmer’s sheep. He said they just went for the jugular on them. This area was notorious for meth labs, and still has drug problems, so hence the need to keep “guard” dogs. I say quit breeding such potentially dangerous dog breeds.
32
posted on
09/14/2007 3:17:46 PM PDT
by
Citizen Soldier
(Made in USA and proud of it.)
To: NapkinUser
Personal Responsibility!!....but if we don’t have that than I’m all for banning vicious breeds. As someone in an earlier post stated you don’t hear about a cocker spaniel killing. I’ts always a pit bull. I once had a Irish Setter we “rescued” Dumb dog took down a fawn. We returned him. Won’t have a problem dog. We also took back a lab that bit my daughter once. We love our pets but will not tolerate irresponsibility.
33
posted on
09/14/2007 8:08:07 PM PDT
by
lula
( Islam IS the Anti-Christ)
To: Ditter
Have they given up? Maybe... especially after the last couple threads we've seen here.
34
posted on
09/14/2007 8:10:33 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: NapkinUser; Inyo-Mono
Thanks for further proving my point about media-made fear. Media made fear? This isn't global warming we're talking about.
Two people are dead and you're talking like it's alarmism? How ridiculous. It's no wonder pitbull owners and defenders have no credibility.
35
posted on
09/14/2007 8:17:04 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Two people are dead and you're talking like it's alarmism? How ridiculous. How many people are killed each year by pit bulls? About the same as people killed each year by falling coconuts?
36
posted on
09/14/2007 8:44:09 PM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: metmom
Given up?
I'll never give up fighting ignorance.
37
posted on
09/14/2007 10:40:50 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
To: Ditter
Pit bulls were bred to kill people?
That's news to me. Pit bull-type dogs have been around for a long time. They certainly weren't bred to kill people.
Also, do you not think that irrespnsible owners of pit bulls are at fault?
38
posted on
09/14/2007 10:46:18 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
To: Ditter
I have seen several threads about pit bulls killing and maiming folks and the pit bull defenders have not stepped forward with their usual spin. Have they given up?There's a rumor floating around that the pit bull loving mod isn't a mod at FR any more.
39
posted on
09/14/2007 11:14:53 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: SIDENET
Pit bulls were bred to kill! With that characteristic in the breeding it is easy for them to slip over the line and kill anything. I have seen where responsible pit bull owners say repeatedly “he/she was the sweetest dog and never was vicious before (before it killed the baby/child/grandmother)”
These dogs have an inbred uncertainty that should give people pause before they bring that puppy home.
40
posted on
09/15/2007 6:24:19 AM PDT
by
Ditter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson