To: nicmarlo
This is a very common pattern in modern medical (psuedo) science - confusing cause with effect. The virus is the result of weakned immunity due to toxic pesticide exposure.
(And many times the so called virus is not a virus at all. It is residual proteins due to altered meatabolism, i.e. auto generated toxins.)
To attribute the bee affliction to a virus is medical sophistry. The major benefactor of course are the pharmaceuticals that “fight” the virus.
41 posted on
01/19/2008 8:41:30 AM PST by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Rennes Templar
It is residual proteins due to altered meatabolism, i.e. auto generated toxins. To attribute the bee affliction to a virus is medical sophistry. The major benefactor of course are the pharmaceuticals that “fight” the virus. Your post makes absolute sense and, of course, the pesticide companies want to bury the facts...
42 posted on
01/19/2008 8:44:41 AM PST by
nicmarlo
(I hereby declare my support for Duncan Hunter. 1/10/08; late to the party, but I have arrived!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson